SAVE THE OWLS ! - Ban Rat Poison

Hello Owl Lovers,

Great news!   Saanich Councillors Ned Taylor and Colin Plant submitted a notice of Motion to Saanich council to ban anticoagulant rodenticides (rat poison) in all Saanich owned properties. They want Council to urge the Province to consider BC-wide prohibition of anticoagulant rodenticides due to the threat it poses to local wildlife and pets. See links to our media campaign below for your reference regarding the recent owl deaths.

Saanich Council will vote on this motion on July 13th, and they need letters of support from you and your community.

 

The motion reads as follows:

1. That Council provide direction to staff to implement a ban of anticoagulant rodenticides in the District of Saanich.

2. That Council request that the Mayor write, on behalf of council, to the Premier of British Columbia, appropriate ministers, copying MLAs in the Capital Region, requesting that the Province of British Columbia ban anticoagulant rodenticides. 

3. That Council directs staff to communicate to residents and businesses in the District of Saanich council’s direction on this matter, the harmful impacts of anticoagulant rodenticides, and better alternatives that are available.

4. That Council share this report with all other local governments in the Province of British Columbia. 

 You may copy and paste this letter below or write your own to the Mayor and Council of Saanich (emails below). Please include stories of how the owl deaths have impacted you and what you have seen. Also, please give a big thank you to Mayor Haynes for his support of this initiative. 

 And share this campaign far and wide!!!

Follow Owl Watch BC Facebook Page for updates  https://www.facebook.com/owlwatchbc/

If comfortable doing so, can you bcc us on your letter you submit please.

 Thank you,

Deanna Pfeifer and Rob Vanzella

Members of Owl Watch BC

 Template Letter

Dear Mayor Fred Haynes and Council,

I am writing in support of  Councilor Ned Taylor’s and Councillor Colin Plant’s Agenda item on July 13th regarding banning AntiCoagulant Rodenticides.

 Owls are perishing across the Province and the Nation due to secondary poisoning from highly toxic Second Generation Anticoagulants (SGAR's).  Rat poison moves through the food chain after  a rodent ingests it.

 164 owls in western Canada were analyzed in a lab, where scientists found that 70% had residues of at least one rodenticide in their livers. Researchers found that at least half of those owls had multiple rodenticides in their system.(See google drive link below for owl study from 2009).

 The necropsy from the Great Horned Owl found in Saanich had 3 different types of Commercial grade anticoagulant rodenticides in its system and 2 of them are so potent they are not to be used outdoors. (See necropsy in google drive link).

 Other wildlife and domestic animals are also at risk of secondary poisoning and many of them go undetected and  under reported as testing is problematic. As well as the owls in Kings Community Nature Space, we have had anecdotal reports of several otherwise healthy dogs who live in the area or visit the area daily become very ill with vomiting and diarrhea. Dead or poisoned rats are easy prey for curious pets. BCSPCA and College of Vets are aware of the owl necropsy reports.

 We know there are safer alternatives such as Contrapest and automatic traps (goodnature.ca).The District of North Vancouver did an extensive investigative report on the subject of secondary poisoning of wildlife due to rodenticides and voted unanimously this month to ban rodenticides in municipal owned facilities. (See attached report in google drive link below)

 The report highlights how using other methods to control rats instead of rodenticides is cheaper in the long run. Owls eat 1000 rats a year. They help keep the rodent population in balance naturally and are FREE of charge.

 I fully support Councillors Ned Taylor and Colin Plant’s motion and applaud them for taking action on this serious issue in our community.

Thank you,


Very Important Meeting For All North Jubilee Residents - March 3, 2020 - 7pm - RJH, Patient Care Centre, Room S150.

NJNA announces important community meeting regarding Victoria City Council's proposed "Housing Strategy" - proposals sure to affect your neighbourhood. 

City staff will be on hand to present.  Please mark your calendar for Tuesday, March 3rd at 7 pm, RJH, Patient Care Centre, Room S150. 

NJNA newsletter attached here

Please read more here:

Missing Middle Housing

Resident Housing Strategy

Next Generation House Conversion

Also, come to the meeting to ask Councillor Alto about the following Council member motions:

Endorsement of Declaration of Solidarity with the Wet’suwt’en People"....This resolution will be sent to the Premier of British Columbia, copying the Solicitor General and Members of the Legislative Assembly representing constituencies in the Capital Region."

  • AVICC and UBCM Advocacy Motions Passed by the Renters’ Advisory Committees"Council endorsed the following resolutions to be forwarded for consideration at the Association of Vancouver Island and Coastal Communities convention:

    • That the Union of British Columbia Municipalities request that the Province amend the Community Charter to grant municipalities the option of setting different property tax rates for land and improvements

    • That the Province amend the Residential Tenancy Act to strengthen standards of property maintenance that set out a breadth of health, safety, and security standards, and establish enforcement mechanisms that ensure adherence to these standards 

    • That the Province amend the Residential Tenancy Act to reduce “no pet” clauses in lease agreements in British Columbia as long as responsible ownership and animal welfare issues are also considered."

Letter To Mayor & Council

As the city does not always act on the Official Community Plan (OCP), Victoria Neighbourhood Associations have gotten together to voice our concerns in the following letter:


VCAN
Victoria Community Association Network 

Re: Council Consideration of OCP Amendments 

Dear Mayor Helps and Council, 

May 9th, 2019 


The member associations of VCAN are united in requesting Council and Staff follow best practices in land use planning by unequivocally upholding the Official Community Plan. 

Background 

The Official Community Plan (OCP) is the foundation planning document that governs long term planning and sustainability goals citywide. 

Members of VCAN are concerned that requests for OCP amendments are coming forward on an ad hoc basis with little public consultation and are being considered by Council without the demonstration of a compelling public benefit. Ad hoc OCP amendments require only a 200‐meter public notification distance, while the proposals, if approved, may have far reaching precedence citywide, encouraging further ad hoc amendments to the OCP with the result of the undermining of the public trust placed in our planning process. 

The OCP was contemplated and enacted with the agreement of all of the citizen stakeholders within the community and this bylaw is considered by members of VCAN as an essential piece of the necessary balance between the interests of the development industry and the community. As such, amendments to this guiding document should be infrequent and only when demonstrably in the best interests of the residents of the community. This is consistent with the significance of the citywide engagement process that formed an important part of the development of the OCP and should be the starting point of any evaluation of a proposed development. 

The current unpredictable, frequent and somewhat opaque nature of ad hoc
Official Community Plan (OCP) amendments, and the meager public notification they require, only serve to undermine the public trust placed in the planning process and in local government. They also represent, at base, a failure at the level of implementation to respect the process, consultations and extensive stakeholder engagement directed and undertaken by the city to create the OCP in the first place. 


Request of Mayor and Council: 

The member associations of VCAN are united in requesting the following: 

  1. That no more amendments be granted to Section 6: Land Management and Development (pg 33 ‐ 50) of the OCP, without first requiring and receiving a developer‐funded independent study of where and why changes are being proposed that are contrary to OCP policy. This study must be provided prior to the CALUC meeting and would form part of the public notice.

  2. That for ALL potential OCP amendments, developers provide a detailed rationale that responds to all social and physical policy directions contained in the OCP. This rationale is to be specifically addressed in the first staff report prior to first reading of any OCP amendment bylaw.

In summary, the undersigned VCAN member organizations do not support OCP amendments that do not comply with the two criteria identified above. We ask that these criteria be immediately applied to current developments or initiatives that require an OCP amendment. 

We hope Council will undertake to preserve and support best practice in land use, consistent with other localities and with its own previously expressed intentions, by adopting the same position. 

Sincerely, 

Burnside Gorge Community Association Downtown Residents Association
Fairfield Gonzales Community Association Fernwood Community Association
Hillside Quadra Neighbourhood Action Committee James Bay Neighbourhood Association 

North Jubilee Neighbourhood Association North Park Neighbourhood Association Oaklands Community Association Rockland Neighbourhood Association South Jubilee Neighbourhood Association Victoria West Community Association